Skip to content

Understanding typo detection

This page explains the mental model behind the typos analyzer: how it detects typo-fix identifier pairs, what Levenshtein distance measures, and how the aggregation pipeline is structured. For configuration keys and the output schema, see the Typos reference.


What it measures

The typos analyzer detects typo-fix identifier pairs from source code in commit diffs using Levenshtein distance. It builds a dataset of probable typos and their corrections by analyzing UAST identifier changes across Git history.

Typo-fix pair detection

For each commit, the analyzer:

  1. Computes the line diff between the old and new versions of each changed file (both versions must be text and parse with the UAST)
  2. Aligns delete/insert hunk pairs of equal size (line i of each)
  3. Keeps the aligned line pairs whose whole lines are within the distance threshold — a cheap prefilter that bounds the UAST work
  4. Extracts the UAST identifiers of each kept line pair and diffs them as multisets: identifiers present on both lines cancel, whatever their position
  5. Records a typo-fix pair when exactly one identifier remains on each side, both are non-empty and different, and the two identifiers are within the distance threshold of each other

The distance is therefore applied twice: to the whole line (prefilter) and to the identifier pair (the rule). A literal change next to an unchanged identifier leaves nothing after cancellation and is never a typo; a rename to an unrelated name fails the pair bound.

Levenshtein distance

The Levenshtein distance is the minimum number of single-character edits (insertions, deletions, substitutions) needed to transform one string into another. A small distance between the old and new identifier suggests a typo fix rather than a semantic change.

Example

  • recieve to receive -- distance 2 (transposed characters)
  • lenght to length -- distance 2 (transposed characters)
  • calcualte to calculate -- distance 2 (transposed characters)

Architecture

The detection rules and the metrics live in the cf-typos crate; the history walk in cf-commands supplies the git and UAST inputs:

  1. Per-commit product: for every Modify change the walk reads both blobs, runs the libgit2 line diff and both UAST parses, and asks cf_typos::candidate_line_pairs for the aligned line pairs within the prefilter and cf_typos::identifier_pair for the one identifier each pair changed. The product is the commit's list of occurrences (file, 1-based line, commit); it is a pure function of the commit, so it is computed in parallel across cores.
  2. Chronological reduce: the shared history core stamps every commit with its identity and tick in oldest-first order, and the occurrences are concatenated in that order — the report never depends on how the work was distributed.
  3. Metrics: cf_typos::metrics_report_value derives typo_list (each distinct pair once, first fix wins), patterns (occurrence counts above one), file_typos and aggregate from the occurrence list, as one value tree that json, yaml and bin encode.

Use cases

  • Typo dataset building: Build a corpus of real-world typos and their corrections from your project's history. This can train spell-checking tools or IDE plugins.
  • Code quality auditing: Identify patterns of common misspellings in your codebase to add to a linting dictionary.
  • API consistency: Detect identifier typos that may cause confusion (e.g., getUserByNmae vs getUserByName).
  • Automated fix suggestions: Use the typo dataset to build automated correction rules for CI pipelines.
  • Research: Academic research on developer typo patterns and their prevalence across different languages.

Limitations

  • UAST required: Only languages with UAST parser support are analyzed. Identifiers in unsupported languages are not extracted.
  • Single-identifier changes only: The analyzer only records a typo when exactly one identifier differs between the old and new lines after the shared identifiers cancel. Multi-identifier changes are skipped to avoid false positives.
  • Equal-length hunks only: Only delete/insert hunk pairs with the same number of lines are considered. A typo fix that also adds or removes lines will be missed.
  • False positives: Intentional identifier renames with small Levenshtein distance (e.g., idx to jdx) will be reported as typos.
  • One list entry per pair: typo_list reports each wrong → correct pair once, at its first fix; the number of times the pair was fixed is in patterns (when above one) and in the per-file and aggregate counts.
  • CPU intensive: Like all UAST-based analyzers, the typos analyzer parses both file versions for every changed file in every commit.

See also